Vertical video: where it stands for publishers
Updated October 31, 2026. Built from the sourced statements Beeler.Tech tracks on vertical video at mcp.beeler.tech.
The short answer
Vertical video is worth testing now. It is not worth betting the page on yet.
Readers are watching. The New York Times says video viewing on its platforms more than doubled in a year, to nearly 200 million minutes in September 2025 (INMA). The Economist says vertical viewing in its app more than doubled too (Nieman Lab).
The money trails the audience. Time says its video ads sell at a 25 to 40% premium over display, but that covers all video, not vertical alone (Digiday). One pub in our community put it best: probably the bigger revenue opportunity, with a much higher opportunity cost (how we use community input).
Where it stands
The big pubs built the feeds. The ad layer is still catching up.
| When | Publisher | What they did |
|---|---|---|
| May 2026 | 20 Minuten | Launched a vertical feed in its app: about 30 videos a day, a team of four, six months to build. Vertical and display ads at launch, no pre-roll |
| Dec 2025 | Time | Runs “Bytes” vertical video on nearly every article page, after the second paragraph. Built with Media.net, also sold direct |
| Nov 2025 | The New York Times | Planned to open its Watch tab to brands in a vertical video ad beta by early 2026. Whether it launched is not confirmed |
| Nov 2025 | The Economist | Vertical viewing in its app more than doubled. The tab supports subscriptions, not ad revenue |
The demand question is older than these launches. In 2023, EX.CO said vertical video on the web earned no CPM premium and drew little programmatic demand (Digiday, sponsored by EX.CO). None of our sources reports a vertical-only CPM since. That is the number to watch.
What publishers report
Building the player is the easy part.
20 Minuten said the player was never the hard part. The hard part is an experience built for short content (persoenlich.com, translated from German).
The Times is betting on curation over the algorithm. “We’re not trying to be TikTok,” said Solana Pyne, its director of video (Nieman Lab). Its ad side is less sure of itself. Video ads are a key growth area, but the right format is still unclear (Digiday).
Newsday’s reason is defensive. If readers shift to video, it wants them still getting their news from Newsday (Nieman Lab).
The buy side sees time on site. Tinuiti’s Brian Binder said vertical is how people consume content now, and more time on site can open more inventory (Digiday).
Who supplies it
Plenty of vendors will sell you a player. Ask each one for vertical-only numbers.
| Company | What they say | Tie to Beeler.Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Minute | Vertical players work on home pages and section fronts. Outstream fits long-dwell pages, instream fits featured media in articles | In View client; our interview |
| EX.CO | Vertical is a major trend. Pubs need video platforms that support vertical and keep improving how it is delivered and monetized | In View client; paid partnership |
| Media.net | Built Time’s “Bytes” vertical module | None |
| JWX | One line of JavaScript to install, then A/B test vertical against other formats | None. The vendor’s own description |
| Mediavine | Upload social video at native 9:16. Sticky square player on mobile, full 9:16 on desktop | None. Mediavine pubs only |
We name who says what and mark our ties. This is not a ranking.
What to do now
Run it as a test, judge it on the session, and count what it costs you. Beeler.Tech recommends:
- Start where vertical already works. Home pages and section fronts (Minute), or high in the article after the second paragraph (Time).
- Feed it what you already have. Your social video at native 9:16 (Mediavine). Have editors curate the feed instead of personalizing it (The New York Times).
- Split-test it. Start on 10% of traffic, go to 50% if it holds, then roll out (Aditude).
- Judge it on the session, not the page. Use session RPM and revenue per session (Clickio). Watch videos per user, watch time and page-load impact at the same time (Minute).
- Net it out. Subtract vendor fees, production and rights, sales and tech costs, and the revenue it pushed off your existing units.
- Sell it, don’t just plug it in. Let brands reuse their social creative so campaigns launch within 48 hours (The New York Times). Bundle it with sponsorships that already include off-site video (Time).
No publisher has published results from running all six steps yet. If you do, we want to hear about it.
Rob’s take
Consumers want vertical video so we should give it to them. If you have direct sales, you need to talk to your clients and see if they can leverage their social media assets. So much creative and work is going to social platforms in the form of vertical video. The hold up seems to be that agency social teams are not talking with the other teams or the value of repurposing these assets hasn’t been established.
Sources
We rewrite this page when five or more new statements land, or when the recommendations change.
- Nieman Lab: news publishers embrace vertical video with in-app watch tabs (Nov 2025)
- Press Gazette: how TikTok inspired the New York Times vertical video strategy (Nov 2025)
- INMA: The New York Times goes all in on video advertising (Nov 2025)
- Digiday: publishers turn to vertical video to compete with creators (Dec 2025, members only)
- persoenlich.com: 20 Minuten Shorts launch (May 2026, German)
- Beeler.Tech: building a video strategy publishers can own, with Minute’s Kyle Orr (Sep 2026)
- Beeler.Tech: what publishers should ask when choosing an OVP, with EX.CO (Sep 2025, paid partnership)
- Digiday, sponsored by EX.CO: web-based vertical video players (Oct 2023)
- Mediavine: turning TikToks into site revenue (Mar 2026)
- JWX: vertical video launch (Feb 2026)
- Aditude: how Aditude uses A/B testing (Aug 2024)
- Clickio: what is session RPM (2018, updated 2023)
- How Beeler.Tech uses community observations